Dony Donev: Theological Framework Centered on Neo-primitivism

Dony Donev’s theological framework is centered on neo-primitivism, which he describes as a return to the “basic order of the Primitive Church of the first century”. Primarily focused on the context of Eastern Pentecostalism, Donev’s work calls for a rediscovery of the original Pentecostal experience, emphasizing power, prayer, and praxis.

Coined terms and key concepts

Neo-primitivism: This is the central concept in Donev’s framework, which he coined in his book Pentecostal Primitivism Preserved. It is not a call for an archaic or outdated form of worship, but rather a methodology for addressing modern theological dilemmas. Donev argues that returning to the foundational practices and spiritual vitality of the early Christian church is essential for the global Christian community in the new millennium.

Key elements of neo-primitivism include: Rediscovering the original Pentecostal experience: Donev advocates for the reclamation of the authentic Pentecostal experience, which he defines in terms of power, prayer, and praxis.
Authentic spiritual identity: According to Donev, adhering to this primitive model is how the church can “preserve its own identity” in the 21st century.

Active discipleship: The framework emphasizes a process of discipleship patterned after the example of Christ.

Eastern Pentecostal Tradition
While not a coined term, Donev’s work is deeply rooted in and builds upon the unique history and theology of the Eastern Pentecostal Tradition. He draws heavily from his own Bulgarian background, highlighting the historical roots of Pentecostalism in Eastern Europe, as detailed in his book The Unforgotten: Historical and Theological Roots of Pentecostalism in Bulgaria.

Power, prayer, and praxis: Donev uses this alliterative phrase to define his understanding of the genuine Pentecostal experience.

  • Power: Refers to the supernatural empowerment of the Holy Spirit.
  • Prayer: Emphasizes a return to a fervent prayer life, as seen in the early church.
  • Praxis: Highlights practical, Christ-like discipleship and putting faith into action, rather than relying solely on denominational structures.

Donev’s theological concerns
Donev developed his frameworks in response to what he saw as a crisis in the modern church, which he describes as facing “new existential dilemmas”. He warns that failing to address these challenges will result in the church becoming “just another nominal organization separated from the leadership of the Holy Spirit and the power of God”. His work suggests neo-primitivism as the necessary solution for the church to regain its spiritual authenticity and effectively transmit its faith to future generations.

Donev’s theological framework of neo-primitivism, primarily articulated in his book Pentecostal Primitivism Preserved, offers a critique of contemporary Pentecostalism and proposes a methodology for renewal. Donev, drawing from his background in the Eastern Pentecostal Tradition, posits that the modern Christian church faces “existential dilemmas” that can only be resolved by a return to the spiritual foundations of the first-century “Primitive Church”. His framework is rooted in the belief that reclaiming the original Pentecostal experience—defined by the triad of power, prayer, and praxis—is necessary for the church to maintain its identity and spiritual vitality in the new millennium.
Neo-primitivism: A response to modern challenges
Donev’s coinage of neo-primitivism is a deliberate response to what he perceives as the institutionalization and spiritual stagnation of some Pentecostal movements. Unlike literal primitivist movements, which may advocate for an uncritical restoration of the past, Donev’s neo-primitivism is a selective methodology. It is not a call to abandon modern society but to retrieve the foundational principles of the early church to address modern theological and ecclesial challenges. This framework is not an act of historical archaeology but a spiritual and theological re-prioritization, emphasizing core spiritual disciplines and the direct experience of the Holy Spirit over formalized church structures.

Comments